Do They Constitute an Entity? A Qualitative Examination on the Entitativity of Social Categories in Turkey

Stok Kodu:
9786258430240
Boyut:
16x24
Sayfa Sayısı:
95
Basım Tarihi:
2021
Kapak Türü:
Ciltsiz
Kağıt Türü:
2. Hamur
%10 indirimli
150,00TL
135,00TL
Taksitli fiyat: 9 x 16,50TL
Temin süresi 2-5 gündür.
9786258430240
1199677
Do They Constitute an Entity? A Qualitative Examination on the Entitativity of Social Categories in Turkey
Do They Constitute an Entity? A Qualitative Examination on the Entitativity of Social Categories in Turkey
135.00

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Defining Entitativity

1.1.1. Cues to Entitativity

1.1.2. Essence-Based vs. Agency-Based Entitativity

1.1.3. The Link Between Essentialism and Entitativity

1.2. Functions of Group Entitativity

1.3. Implications of Group Entitativity for Intergroup Relations

1.4. Critical Perspectives on Measuring Entitativity

1.5. Intergroup Relations in Turkey

1.5.1. Ethnic Divide: The Kurdish-Turkish Context

1.5.2. Religious Divide: The Alevi-Sunni Context

1.5.3. Ideological Divide: The AKP versus CHP Supporters

1.5.4. Gendered Divides: Working Women & Covered Women

1.5.4.1. Working Women

1.5.4.2. Covered Women

1.6. Current Research

CHAPTER 2

A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION ON THE ENTITATIVITY OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN TURKEY

2.1. A Summary of the Study Objectives

2.2. Method

2.2.1. Participants

2.2.2. Qualitative Survey Questionnaire

2.2.3. Procedure

2.3. Results

2.3.1. What is the Lay Definition of Group?

2.3.2. What are the Salient Group Examples in People’s Minds?

2.3.3.1. Groupness Attribution

2.3.3.2. Basis of Rejecting the Groupness

2.3.3.3. Sociopolitical Determinants of Perceived Unity

2.3.3.4. Group-Related Determinants of Perceived Unity

2.4. Discussion

REFERENCES

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1. Defining Entitativity

1.1.1. Cues to Entitativity

1.1.2. Essence-Based vs. Agency-Based Entitativity

1.1.3. The Link Between Essentialism and Entitativity

1.2. Functions of Group Entitativity

1.3. Implications of Group Entitativity for Intergroup Relations

1.4. Critical Perspectives on Measuring Entitativity

1.5. Intergroup Relations in Turkey

1.5.1. Ethnic Divide: The Kurdish-Turkish Context

1.5.2. Religious Divide: The Alevi-Sunni Context

1.5.3. Ideological Divide: The AKP versus CHP Supporters

1.5.4. Gendered Divides: Working Women & Covered Women

1.5.4.1. Working Women

1.5.4.2. Covered Women

1.6. Current Research

CHAPTER 2

A QUALITATIVE EXAMINATION ON THE ENTITATIVITY OF SOCIAL CATEGORIES IN TURKEY

2.1. A Summary of the Study Objectives

2.2. Method

2.2.1. Participants

2.2.2. Qualitative Survey Questionnaire

2.2.3. Procedure

2.3. Results

2.3.1. What is the Lay Definition of Group?

2.3.2. What are the Salient Group Examples in People’s Minds?

2.3.3.1. Groupness Attribution

2.3.3.2. Basis of Rejecting the Groupness

2.3.3.3. Sociopolitical Determinants of Perceived Unity

2.3.3.4. Group-Related Determinants of Perceived Unity

2.4. Discussion

REFERENCES

Yorum yaz
Bu kitabı henüz kimse eleştirmemiş.
Kapat